Review Article

 
Sexual History Taking in Primary Care

 

Ersin Akpinar 1, Esra Saatci 1, Nafiz Bozdemir1

 

1 Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Family Medicine, Adana, Turkey

 

 

 

Abstract:

Sexual history taking is an important part of a comprehensive history. It affords the physician the opportunity to evaluate for sexual transmitted diseases (STDs), contraceptive history, sexual abuse, and sexual dysfunction. In addition, it gives the physician the opportunity to administer appropriate diagnostic tests, treatment, and prevention counselling. Only a small percentage of primary care physicians actually elicit sexual histories. There are many potential barriers to sexual history taking, including embarrassment, inadequate training, time constraints, and a belief that a sexual history is not relevant. The barrier we would like to address further is inadequate training of medical students and residents on how to elicit a sexual history. It is imperative for medical students and residents to receive proper instruction on how to elicit a sexual history. This includes didactic as well as clinical instruction on taking a sexual history. Modeling is a valuable tool in the learning process, and it is important that medical students and residents observe their preceptors eliciting a sexual history. This modeling is necessary for instructional purposes and for validation of the importance and relevance of taking a sexual history. The majority of medical students and residents are not expected to obtain a sexual history as a regular part of a comprehensive examination if there is no chief complaint that warrants a history. Their only opportunity to obtain a sexual history may arise when a patient has a chief complaint that requires a sexual history, and many times they are not supervised when they elicit those histories to ensure they do so appropriately. Increased training of practicing physicians, medical students, and residents on sexual history taking has the potential to have a positive impact on the number of physicians that elicit sexual histories.

 

Key words: Primary care, sexual, history taking.

 

Akpınar E, Saatçı E, Bozdemir N. Sexual history taking in primary care. TJFMPC 2007;1:11-14.


 


Introduction

                                                                                                                                           

The prevalence of sexual problems is not well defined in general population but estimated as 44% in males and 36% in females.1,2 Attitudes and opinions for human sexuality varied lately especially in the developed countries causing more people seeking help for their sexual problems. Nevertheless, people still have sexual myths about sexuality.3

Sexual history taking is a chronological classification of human life cycle consisting sexual behaviour, emotions, expectations, experiences, and social changes.2,4 It gives information about the characteristics (aetiology, onset, severity and duration of symptoms, psychosocial impacts) of the current sexual dysfunction, the changes causing trouble, available personal resources, aims and motivations of marriage, expectations from the therapy, and interpersonal relationship of partners.2,4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why do we need a sexual history?

Human sexuality is a complex of human biology, psychology, culture, and social circumstances. Individuals with sexual problems consult primary care physicians, more than one physician, use several, expensive laboratory tests.5 Sexual functions are divided into phases (Figure 1). It should be kept in mind that these problems usually do not occur alone i.e. a situation causing dysparonia may cause orgasmic dysfunctions and loss of libido. The prevalent error in taking a sex history arises from the assumption that a “sex” history is a thing of meaning apart from a medical and psychosocial history reflecting the individual as a whole person. Even for purposes of structured social survey, significant material rarely is developed by sexually oriented questions uncorrelated with other aspects of an individual’s existence. In truth, in primary care when taken out of context of the total being and his environment, a “sex” history per se would be as relatively meaningless as “heart” history or a “stomach” history.

The essential reason of admission may be masked or covered by various other symptoms. Most of patients with sexual problems seek help from a family physician and they may feel embarrassed and shamed. They admit with low back pain for an orgasm problem or claustrophobia for erectile



 

Figure 1: Cybernetic Model of Sexual Intercourse6

 

 

dysfunction.6-8 The patient usually displays the pattern of “hand on the door knob syndrome”. If the physician feels incompetent about management of sexual problems, he may prefer to deal with other organic problems that are easier to be identified and treated.9 Some physicians think that they may define sexual problems easier if the patient has a complaint such as vaginal discharge, contraception or infertility. The questions such as What did you notice?” How long does it exist?” “Does the problem have a sudden onset or progressive?” “What are the possible reasons?” may be helpful.

The questions about sexuality have four main aims: 10-13

a)       Risk determination and prevention for unintended pregnancies and STDs

b)       Understanding sexual behaviour as they may contribute to symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and prevention process

c)       Opportunity to discuss sexual problems with a professional 

d)       Recognizing the relationship between drugs and sexual dysfunctions14,15

Medical problems usually interfere with personal relationships and sexual functions. Psychological problems such as depression, anxiety, insomnia and phobias may mask or cause sexual problems. Mental status of the patient and medical knowledge and experience of the physician affect the consultation. Advantages and difficulties of sexual history taking are presented in Table 1.

 

Table 1: Advantages and difficulties of sexual history taking

Advantages

Difficulties

Sexual problems are seen as a part of the other problems discussed with the physician.

The process may be embarrassing both for the patient and for the physician.

Talking about sexual topics may enhance the future consultations about sexual problems.

The patient may misunderstand the aim of the physician and may feel as judged.

Talking about sexual activities may give opportunity for health promotion.

The patient may begin to feel anxiety about something that has not been a problem for him/her before.

Obstacles in sexual history taking

Fears of the physician about irritating the patient, seeming curious, anxieties about inability to solve sexual problems or fear of going beyond the limits

 

of doctor-patient relationship are some of the obstacles in sexual history taking.11 Others are; 16

a)       Prejudgements of the health professionals

b)       Limitations in medical knowledge

c)       False expectations and beliefs of health professionals

d)       Cultural, religious, ethnic factors related to patient’s attitudes and beliefs

e)       Language and terminology problems

 

Table 2: Causes of sexual dysfunctions

                      Relationship problems

                      Individual attitudes

                      Attitudes related to sexuality

                      Post coital fear

                      Alcohol and drugs

                      Diseases

                      Inappropriate circumcision

                      Misunderstandings about sexuality

Obstacles and solutions11,17

·    Fears of the physician about irritating the patient about seem to be curious: GP/FP should have specific training about sexual issues.

·    Sexual history is not related to reason of admission: A short history of sexual life should be a part of routine medical history.

·    Limited time: Consultations organised by appointments may avoid the delays in other patient consultations.  

·    The age and gender of the patient: The consultation is easier if the patient is young and the same gender with the physician.

·    Fears of inability to solve problems: The physician should know his limits and use a network of consultation and referral.

·    Others in the consultation room: Partners should be interviewed together and the interaction between them should be encouraged.

·    Vague limits during consultation (example: seductive behaviour of some patients): Limits of the doctor-patient relationship should be definite.  The same rules of confidentiality are valid also for long term relationships and familiar patients.

 

Inadequate knowledge about homosexuality, young generations, cultural and ethnic differences, fear of being judgemental or inconvenient in language: Physicians should be trained about the language they will use during sexual history taking.  Explanations are useful before questions.

Anxieties of the patient about confidentiality: All patients should be given assurance about confidentiality of consultation and medical records.

History taking certainly must provide information sufficient to determine the character (etiological background, symptom onset, severity and duration, psychosocial affect) of the presenting sexual dysfunction. Equally important, history-taking must contribute knowledge of the basic personalities of the marital partners and develop o professional concept of their interpersonal relationship adequate to determine

·    changes that may be considered desirable

·    personal resources and the depth and health of the psychosocial potential from which they can be drawn

·    marital-unit motivation and goals (what the marital partners actually expect from therapy).

 

Table 3: Common conditions which are not

defined as sexual dysfunction

A) Predictors

Pressure

Religious and cultural factors, feeling of guiltiness

Traumatic sexual

experiences

Sexual abuse or  violence

Inadequate sexual

education 

Unrealistic expectations

Family relationship

Oedipal complexes, overprotective behaviour

Life style

Stress, economic problems 

Personality

 

B) Triggers

Organic disease

 

Aging

Loss of libido, more time needed for arousal and orgasm

Unfaithfulness

 

Unrealistic expectations

 

Depression and anxiety

 

Loss of spouse

Divorce, separation or death

 

Methods of taking sexual history

Sexual life may be questioned during personal and social history or obstetric/gynaecological history for women.18 If the complaint is related to genitourinary system sexual history may be taken inside the history of the current medical problem. Sexual life may also be questioned as a part of life style questions such as drug use, diet, exercise. The conditions such as chronic disease, severe pain or dysparonia may affect sexual functions and should also be questioned.19

Questions such as "I have to ask you a few questions to understand the cause of this discharge and what we can do about it". If the symptom is directly related to sexual disease the physician may use the statement "I want to ask you some questions about your sexual life and health".

 

Satisfaction from sexual functions should also be questioned. Some examples of the specific questions are as follows: 20

1. "When did you last have physical intimacy with someone?" "Did this intimacy end with sexual intercourse?" The term "sexual activity" should be avoided as it is not clear enough.

2. "Do you have sexual intercourse with men women or both?. Asking this question may help the physician to predict certain risks for heterosexual, homosexual and bisexuals.

3. "How many sexual partners did you have during the last 6 months?"  This question implies that the patient may have more than one sexual partner. The aim is not to make embarrassed but to have conditions to let him/her accept the possibility of multiple partners.   

4.  Both men and women have to be questioned about contraceptive methods they use, especially the use of condom. "Which method of contraception do you use?" If the answer is none, the question "Did you decide to be a parent lately?" should be asked.

5. "Are you satisfied with your sexual functions (life)?" helps the physician to understand the assessment of the patient about his/her sexual life.

6. Do you have any idea about HIV or AIDS?" helps the physician to ask risky behaviour.

These questions do not ask about marital status, sexual preferences, and behaviour of contraception or pregnancy.

The most common sexual problems are erectile dysfunction, premature and retrograde ejaculation, retarded ejaculation, loss of libido and Peyronie disease for men and vaginismus, orgasmic dysfunction and dysparonia for women.

Adolescents require special interest and care. Adolescents tend to hide their sexual life and this needs more privacy and trust in doctor-patient relationship. 21

 

Table 4: Sexual History

Sexual games in childhood

Age when played

Where, with which sex

Caught and/or punished

Circumcision for boys

age

reaction

Menstruation

age of onset

preknowledge

source and level of information

reaction

Sexual knowledge

age

source

level

Masturbation

age of onset

frequency

beliefs, reactions, attitudes

fantasies

functionality

Premarital sexuality

age of the first date

sex and number of partners

duration of relationships

kissing, fore playing, genital touching

First intercourse

sex and type of partner

with or without money

marital or other kind of relationship

functional problems

Type of marriage

with or without knowing each other

period before marriage

level of sexual behaviour

first night of the marriage

customs, traditions

reactions

Libido

frequency

harmony with the partner

lust for others or willing to masturbate

Frequency of sexual relationship

current

desired

Fore play

duration

contribution

types

nakedness

avoiding genitals or semen

Sexual arousal

Lubrication

Erection

Arousal problem in each intercourse

Intercourse

Duration

Pain/ contraction

Orgasm

With masturbation

Oral or manual

During intercourse

Gynaecological history

Cycles

Menstruation problems

Deliveries

Abortus

Miscarriage

Intent to have a child

Method of contraception

Hymen

Gynaecological disease and treatments

 

 

 

The physicians may figure out the differential diagnosis with the help of a complete medical history (Figure 2). A good medical history is one of the most important tools in assessing sexual dysfunctions. Unfortunately physicians tend to use complex and unnecessary laboratory and radiological tests. In the process of differential diagnosis the physician tries to find the aetiology of sexual dysfunction (Table 2).

 

The majority of sexual dysfunctions have psychogenic aetiology due to inadequate sexual education, myths, and exaggerated expectations. Vaginismus in women and premature ejaculation in men are psychogenic more than 90%. However  organic aetiology such as alcohol/drug abuse, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, history of abdominal/pelvic operations should be kept in mind in dysparonia and erectile dysfunction. Secondary or late onset sexual dysfunctions have usually organic cause (Table 3).22,23

 

The most common inventory used for sexual problems is The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) which was developed by sex therapists in The Maudsley Sexual Dysfunction Clinic, was published by Windsor Nfer in 1995 and was standardized using a sample of 88 patients ongoing sexual therapy in various clinics in UK. It assesses the quality of sexual relationship and functions. It is for heterosexual couples having heterosexual relationships. Man and woman have separate forms.24 Tugrul et al studied the validity and reliability in 1993 for Turkey. The last scores in the inventory are about sexual impotence, premature ejaculation, vaginismus, anorgasm, avoiding, dissatisfaction, and problems of communication. The Golombok Rust Inventory of Marital State (GRIMS) assesses the quality of a relationship and can be used with GRISS. It gives information about common interests of the couple, level of independency, communication, sexuality, intimacy, love, hate, trust, respect, roles, expectations, aims, decision making, and dealing with problems and crisis. Inventories are helpful in screening and rapid diagnosis however face-to-face consultation is of vital importance (Table 4).25,26,29 Important issues of a sexual problem are presented in Table 5.

 

Other inventories are The Sexual Interaction Inventory (SII) developed by LoPicollo and Stegger, Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory (DSFI) developed by Derogatis and Melisaratos and Sexual History Form (SHF) by Schover et al.5,27,29

The classification of sexual dysfunctions is presented in Table 6.18

 

 

 

 

Table 5: Important issues of sexual problem

situational / global

Primary / secondary

Perception of the problem by the partner

How does the problem affect the relationship?

Expectations from the therapy

Level of communication, conflicts between partners, coping with problems

 

 

Conclusion

Skills of taking sexual history in primary care can be improved by training. Sexual history should be a part of routine medical history. Both the physicians and the patient should know that sexual problems may be related to medical or social reasons or vice versa.

 

Table 6: Classification of sexual dysfunctions according to the aetiology

Organic aetiology

Psychogenic aetiology

Erectile dysfunction

Vaginismus

Dysparonia

Primary premature ejaculation

Loss of libido

Primary retarded ejaculation

Secondary orgasmic disorders

Primary female orgasmic disorders

Secondary premature ejaculation

 

Secondary retarded ejaculation

 

 

 

References:

 

1.       Carter Y, Moss C and Weyman A: RCGP Handbook of Sexual Health in Primary Care. College of Hill Press Limited (1998) pp 147-150.

2.       Dunn KM: The Impact of Sexual Problems in the General Population. Dissertation for the diploma in epidemiology. Keele University (1996) pp 44-51.

3.       Wimberly Y and Moore S: Sexual History Taking Should Be Taught in Medical School. Letters to the Editor. Am Fam Physician (2003) 68:2, 223.

4.       Gillan P: Handbook of sexual problems and therapies. Translated by Eker E, Ozmen M, Ozmen E. Mentes Press, Ankara. (1993) 56-87 (in Turkish).

5.       Kinsey AC: Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders (1948) pp 26-33.

6.       Kinsey AC: Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, (1948) pp 11-19.

7.       Sungur MZ: Sexual dysfunction and infertility. J Sexual and Marital Therapy (1977) 12:181-182.

8.       Graziottin A: Sexuality and the menopause. In: Studd J (ed). The management of menopause. Annual review. London, Parthenon Publishing (1988) 49-58.

9.       Masters WB and Johnson VE: Human Sexual Behaviour. Translated by Sayin U. Istanbul, Foundation of Translation of Scientific and Technical Publications (1994) 67-73 (in Turkish)

10.    Kaplan HS: The anatomy and physiology of the sexual response. Kaplan HS (ed). The new sex therapy. New York, Brunner/Mazel (1974) 27-56.

11.    Hawton K: Sex Therapy. Oxford University Press (1985) 33-42.

12.    Yetkin N and Incesu C: Review of terms used in sexual dysfunctions. Archives of Neuropsychiatry (1997) 4: 37-41 (in Turkish).

13.    Horsley P: Improving sexual history taking by general practitioners. Health Sharing Woman. (1995)12-14.

14.    Sungur MZ: Difficulties in sex therapy. The Journal of 3P Psychopharmacology (1994) (supplement 3):37-44 (in Turkish).

15.    Kayir A: Sexuality and sexual dysfunctions. Adam E, Tukel RM, Yazici O. (ed) Psychiatry. Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine. Istanbul (1995) 228-239 (in Turkish).

16.    Sungur M: Evaluation of couples referred to a sexual dysfunction unit and prognostic factors in sexual and marital therapy. Sexual and Marital Therapy (1994) 9(3): 251-265.

17.    Yetkin N: Taking sexual history and assessing sexual functions. Monograph series of sexual dysfunctions-1, aetiology and differential diagnosis in sexual dysfunctions. Yetkin N, Incesu C.(ed) Istanbul (1998) 27-29 (in Turkish).

18.    Merrill J, Laux L and Thornby J:  Why doctors have difficulty with sex histories. Southern Medical Journal (1990) 83: 613–617.

19.    Sungur MZ: Sexual dysfunctions and interdisciplinary relationships. Monograph series of sexual dysfunctions-1, aetiology and differential diagnosis in sexual dysfunctions. Yetkin N, Incesu C.(ed) Istanbul (1999) 26-28 (in Turkish).

20.    Ozguven IE: Sexuality and sexual life. PDREM publications, Ankara (1997) 13-19 (in Turkish).

21.    Hite S: The Hite report on male sexuality. Intercourse and the definition of male sexuality. Ballentine books, New York (1982) pp 336-339.

22.    Masters WB and Johnson VE: Human sexual inadequacy. Concept of history taking. Bantam Books, New York (1980) pp 23-50.

23.    Bor R, Miller R, Latz M and Salt H:  Counselling in health care settings. Cassell,  London (1999) pp 89-94.

24.    Miller D and Green J: The psychology of sexual health. Blackwell Science, Oxford (2002) pp 132-140.

25.    Ross M and Channon-Little L: Discussing sexuality. McLellan & Petty, Sydney. (1991) pp 90-98.

26.    Historical Review, ICD-9 Glossary and classification, and ICD-9 CM classification. (Appendix E). In DSM III-R: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition revised. Washington, American Psychiatric Association (1987)  pp 433-490.

27.    ICD-10 Classification of psychiatric and behavioural disorders, (World Health Organisation (1992) Ankara, Publication of Turkish Association for Mental Health (1993) pp 181-184 (in Turkish).

28.    DSM-IV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth edition. Washington, American Psychiatric Association (1994) pp 493-538.

29.    Crowe M.J, Gillan P.W and Golombok S: Form and content in the conjoint treatment of sexual dysfunction, a control study. Journal of Behaviour and Research Therapy (1981) 19:47-54.